Engineering Professionals nec (ANZSCO 233999)

On the Medium and Long-term Strategic Skills List and Core Skills Occupation List

From the official Home Affairs skilled occupation lists, as at 2026-08-12. Lists change at each government update — always confirm on the official page before acting.

Which lists is Engineering Professionals nec on?

MLTSSL — Medium and Long-term Strategic Skills List. The widest list — occupations on the MLTSSL can access the points-tested permanent skilled visas including the Skilled Independent visa (subclass 189), which needs no state nomination or employer.

CSOL — Core Skills Occupation List. The employer-sponsorship list — occupations on the CSOL can be nominated for the Skills in Demand visa (subclass 482) and the Employer Nomination Scheme 186.

Visas this occupation can access

Being on a list makes the occupation nominatable for these visas — each visa still has its own requirements (points, age, English, a positive skills assessment, and for sponsored visas a willing employer or state).

Skills assessment

A positive skills assessment for Engineering Professionals nec comes from:

What the assessment actually involves

Engineers Australia assesses Engineering Professionals nec through the same accredited-qualification-or-CDR structure as the rest of this family. ANZSCO names exactly eight occupations under this code: Acoustic, Calibration, Corrosion, Fire Safety, Mechatronics, Product Design, Safety, and Test and Activation (Naval Shipbuilding) Engineer. As with every 2339 code, nominating this occupation auto-populates your category as Professional Engineer. This dossier could not find any current Engineers Australia page giving direct guidance on when nec is or is not the correct nomination, beyond that named ANZSCO occupation list itself.

Where these applications come unstuck

The documented, first-hand failure mode: a 2008 forum thread shows an applicant asking about "Engineer(nec)" and being told to nominate "Engineering Technologist NEC" and write the CDR around "generic engineering knowledge" — treating nec as an easy, discipline-agnostic catch-all. That framing does not match the current ANZSCO structure. Nec covers exactly eight named disciplines, not "any engineer who doesn't fit elsewhere," and someone practising a discipline that already has its own named 2339 code — aeronautical, agricultural, biomedical, environmental, naval architecture, or the technologist categories — does not belong under nec by default, however generalist the day-to-day work feels.

An honest read on this pathway

Full MLTSSL and CSOL membership, reaching the same eight visas as every code in this family — genuinely open, but only for the eight named occupations. Nothing about the pathway rewards a broad or vague self-description; the fit is decided by matching your actual work against that specific list, not by how well "engineer, other" seems to describe your job title.

Preparing a CDR for Engineers Australia? The CDR Organiser structures your three career episodes and summary statement against the assessment criteria — your own writing, organised properly. Engineers Australia runs plagiarism detection, so a ghost-written CDR is a real risk to your application.

Talk it through with a registered agent

Whether nominating Engineering Professionals nec is your best route depends on your points, experience evidence and timing — exactly what a MARA-registered agent works through in an initial consultation. Describe your situation once through Migratio and compare real consultation quotes from registered agents, free.

Compare registered agents — free

Related occupations

All skilled occupations · Points calculator · Skilled visa agents